English teenagers are to receive compulsory(必修的)cooking lessons in schools. The idea is to encourage healthy eating to fight the country’s increasing obesity(肥胖)rate. It’s feared that basic cooking and food preparation skills are being lost as parents turn to pre-pre-pared convenience foods.
Cooking was once regarded as an important part of education in England-even if it was mainly aimed at girls. In recent decades cooking has progressively become a minor activity in schools. In many cases the schools themselves have given up cooking meals in kitchens in the schools .But the rising level of obesity has led to a rethink about the food that children are given and the skills they should be taught.
“What I want is to teach young people how to do basic, simple recipes like a tomato sauce, a bolognaise, a simple curry, a stir-fry-which they can use now at home and then in their later life”, said Ed Balls, the minister responsible for schools.
The new lessons are due to start in September, but some schools without kitchens will be given longer to adapt. There is also likely to be a shortage of teachers with the right skills, since the trend has been to teach food technology rather than practical cooking. Also the compulsory lessons for hands on cooking will only be one hour a week for one term. But the well-known cookery writer, Pru Leith, believes it will be worth it .
“If we’d done this thirty years ago we might not have the crisis we’ve got now about obesity and lack of knowledge about food and so on. Every child should know how to cook, not just so that they’ll be healthy, but because it’s a life skill which is a real pleasure”.
The renewed interest in cooking is primarily a response to the level of obesity in Britain which is among the highest in Europe, and according to government figures half of all Britains will be obese in 25 years if current trends are not stopped.The passage mainly talks about .
A.the compulsory cooking classes | B.the lost cooking skills |
C.the healthy eating | D.the reason for obesity |
Which of the following is NOT the purpose for English teenagers to receive cooking lessons?
A.To encourage teenagers to eat healthy food. |
B.To reduce the country’s increasing obesity rate. |
C.To prevent basic cooking and food preparation skills from being lost. |
D.To stop parents from turning to pre-prepared convenience foods. |
In what way will cooking lessons benefit the students?
A.They will be able to do some basic, simple recipes like a tomato sauce. |
B.They will be healthy and enjoy the pleasure of such a life skill as well. |
C.They will be able to make food experiments with the knowledge and skills. |
D.They will be able to control the level of obesity in the whole country. |
The well-known cookery writer, Pru Leith, thinks it to offer compulsory cooking lessons in schools.
A.difficult | B.necessary | C.funny | D.timely |
It can be inferred from the passage that .
A.cooking has always been an important part of school education in England |
B.English teenagers will have their cooking lessons twice a week for one year |
C.the obesity rate in Britain has been rapidly growing in recent decades |
D.the students will pay a lot of money to the school for their cooking lessons |
Recently in the hope of earning both money and social experience, I became a door-trw door salesman.
I once read a saying. “If somebody wants something of yours, you will be treated as warmly as spring, but if they don’t you may be treated as coldly as winter.” You may consider this an exaggeration (夸张), but if you are a salesman, it is clearly correct.
You would never have found it to be so true if you hadn’t been a salesman. You needn’t stand doubtful looks and unfriendly comments; you needn’t listen to something completely wrong and nod to say that it was quite right, you needn’t worry about being refused time after time; you needn’t always keep patience and a smile; you needn’t repeat the same sentences over and over again; you needn’t talk to somebody you dislike ....
I did this work for a month, then I decided to give it up; Apart from the reasons above, I found I was paying too much attention to the job and thus sacrificing my study time. The latest test result proved that my grades were getting worse.
Even worse, I hadn’t enough time to join my classmates in college activities. Some times 1 felt lonely and unhappy because of both my study and my part-time job. Now I don’t think it is worth doing such a thing for even though I was earning money it came at great cost.
Newspapers and magazines often publish stories about excellent students who do part-time work while also keeping high scores in class. But according to my experience, park-time work can have some strong negative influences on study.
Most students don’t view the relationship between study and work correctly. In my opinion, if it isn’t a must for financial reasons, students should be careful about taking up a part-time job. From the text, we can tell that the writer is _____.
A.an unemployed man | B.a middle-school student |
C.a college student | D.a door-to-door salesman |
Which of the following words has the closest meaning to the underlined word “sacrificing”?
A.Losing | B.Wasting | C.Using | D.Getting |
The writer thought_____.
A.doing a part-time job was unnecessary |
B.part-time jobs had good effect upon study |
C.it was hard to deal with the relationship between study and work |
D.part-time jobs would be good for every college student |
What would be the best title for the text _____.
A.Part-time Jobs Are Useful | B.Part-time Jobs Can Cost Dear |
C.Students Shouldn’t Take Part-time Jobs | D.Part-time Jobs Are Important to Many Students |
◇Share Flats Happy Valley big flat, 1 room ready for use immediately. Quiet and convenient, fully furnished, park view. $6, 800 including bills with maid. Female nonsmoker. No pet. Sara 25720836 or 10077809.
◇Moving Sale 2 armchairs, red/brown at$400 each;coffee table, black. wood. $800;oil painting, big, $900;Tianjin carpet, green 3 x7, $600;double bed, $500;mirror, big, square, $500;fridge, big, double—door, $1000;old pictures, $140 up each;plants, big and small Tel:Weekend, 2521—601 l/Weekday. 2524—5867
◇Part—time Laboratory Assistant Wanted Required by busy electronics(电子)company to help with development of computer Should have an electronics degree and some practical experience of working in an electronics laboratory Hours 9:30 a. m. 一l:00 p. m. Mon. -Fri. Fourteen days paid leave. Salary¥6598—10230 dependent on experience. Letter of application to:Mrs. G Chan, NOVA ELECTRONICS, 45 Gordon Rd, Hung Hom Kowloon. The one who put on the first ad probably wants to .
A.rent a beautiful flat of her own in Happy Vallev |
B.find another lady to share the cost to rent a flat |
C.share her room in a flat with whoever has no pet |
D.employ a maid to look after herself and the flat |
According to the ads, you may .
A.buy an old picture for$150 | B.call at 25720836 and see a beautiful park |
C.buy two armchairs for$400 | D.hire a maid by paying $6 800 |
If you want to buy some old furniture. you should .
A.get in touch with NOVA ELECTRONICS |
B.call at 2524-5867 any day except Monday |
C.do it before you move to another place |
D.call at either2524—5867 on Monday or 2521~6011 on Saturday |
Once you can get a part-time job in NOVA ELECTRONICE, .
A.you have to work at least 4 hours a day |
B.you should write a letter to Mrs. G Chan |
C.you will be given 14 days off each year besides weekends |
D.you will get no more than $6598 each month |
In a very real sense, people who have read good literature have lived more than people who cannot or will not read. To have read Gulliver’s Travels is to have had the experience of listening to Jonathan Swift, of learning about man’s cruelty to man. To read Huckleberry Finn is to feel what it is like to drift (漂流) down the Mississippi River on a raft . To have read Byron is to have suffered his rebellions with him and to have enjoyed his nose—thumbing at (对……的蔑视) society. To have read Native Son is to know how it feels to be frustrated in the particular way in which Blacks in Chicago are frustrated. This is effective communication. It enables us to feel how others felt about life, even if they lived thousands of miles away and centuries age. It is not true that “We have only one life to live.” If we read, we can live as many more lives and as many kinds of lives as we wish.The sentence “People who have read good literature have lived more than people who cannot or will not read” suggests that ______.
A.reading stimulates(激发)a desire to travel | B.reading broadens a person’s experience |
C.people who read much live longer | D.people who read are more relaxed |
The author implies that good literature ______.
A.must deal with social problems | B.must teach a lesson |
C.is varied in subject and in content | D.is always exciting and heart--warming |
According to the author, reading good literature ______.
A.produces new income | B.is quite useless |
C.satisfies the curious | D.opens new worlds to us |
The underlined word effective in this passage means ______.
A.actual | B.striking | C.existing | D.having an effect |
A nobleman and a merchant once met in an inn. For their lunch they both ordered soup. When it was brought, the nobleman took a spoonful, but the soup was so hot that he burned his mouth and tears came to his eyes, The merchant asked him why he was weeping. The nobleman was ashamed to admit that he had burned his mouth and answered, “Sir, I once had a brother who committed a great crime , for which he was hanged. I was thinking of his death, and that made me weep.” The merchant believed this story and began to eat his soup. He too burned his mouth, so that he had tears in his eyes. The nobleman noticed it and asked the merchant, “Sir, why do you weep?” The merchant, who now saw that the nobleman had deceived (欺骗) him, answered, “My lord(="master)," I am weeping because you were not hanged together with your brother.”This story teaches us ______.
A.not to eat in inns | B.not to eat soup that is too hot |
C.to cry when we burn our mouth | D.not to believe everything you hear |
The nobleman did not tell the truth because he ______.
A.was a nobleman | B.felt ashamed | C.was in an inn | D.was angry |
It is probable that the nobleman ______.
A.had no brother who was hanged | B.had a very good brother |
C.knew the soup was too hot | D.had never eaten soup |
The merchant’s answer showed that he ______.
A.was very happy | B.believed the nobleman |
C.was angry with the nobleman | D.had kind heart |
Dear Economist,
My newly-wedded wife and I are deeply in love.There is, however, one issue that threatens the happiness of our marriage.I absolutely insist on shopping at Walmart.My wife, meanwhile, would rather avoid Walmart at all costs.
I have recently tried to convince her that not only does Walmart offer the lowest prices known to man, but that the chain is also a force for good―lower prices mean better standards of living for all consumers, increased global trade means a tighter-knit(紧密团结的) international community, and efficient operations translate into higher productivity growth for the economy.My wife complains about poor labour policies, the “fact” that Walmart squeezes suppliers, and that it puts local shops out of business.
Who is right? Will our marriage survive?
Brian Gee
Dear Brian,
I have to agree with you about Walmart.Jason Furman, then an economist at New York University, now an adviser to President Obama, famously argued in 2005 that Walmart was unwittingly (不知不觉地) a progressive success story.The chain’s prices don’t much affect me (I prefer Whole Foods) but Furman estimated that they benefited low-and-middle-income Americans to the sum of around $250 billion a year.
Walmart does not pay much, so it may depress wages.Then again, it may increase wages by offering jobs to the otherwise-unemployed.Either way, the benefits of low prices to Walmart shoppers far outweigh any seemingly reasonable costs to Walmart employees.And while it is true that Walmart employees tend to be poor, the same is true of Walmart shoppers.
Armed with this information you can face your wife with confidence.You are sure to win the conversation.The divorce is likely to be more argued.
EconomistWhat concerns Brian Gee so much that he wrote the letter?
A.His wife refuses to shop at Walmart. |
B.They are faced with a divorce. |
C.They can’t afford the costs of shopping at Walmart. |
D.They are in conflict about shopping at Walmart. |
Brian Gee’s wife tends to hold the opinion that _________.
A.it is wrong for Walmart to depress its employees’ wages |
B.consumers’ lives have improved thanks to Walmart |
C.Walmart’s business operation increases productivity in economy |
D.Walmart’s business increases global trade |
What can be inferred from the reply letter?
A.Some employees accept the low pay to keep the job. |
B.Walmart appeals to only poor consumers and poor employees. |
C.Employees suffer from Walmart’s low prices more than consumers. |
D.Jason Furman, a New York University economist, spoke highly of Walmart. |