In a few states where racial prejudice is serious, violence has so come to be taken for granted as a means of solving differences, that it is not even questioned. There are states where the white man imposes his rule by force; there are states where the black man protests by setting fire to cities and by looting and pillaging. Important people on both sides, who would in other respects appear to be reasonable men, get up and calmly argue in favor of violence – as if it were a legitimate solution, like any other. What is really frightening, what really fills you with despair, is the realization that when it comes to the crunch, we have made no actual progress at all. We may wear collars and ties instead of war-paint, but our instincts remain basically unchanged. The whole of the recorded history of the human race, that tedious documentation of violence, has taught us absolutely nothing. We have still not learnt that violence never solves a problem but makes it more serious. The sheer horror, the bloodshed, the suffering mean nothing. No solution ever comes to light the morning after when we dismally contemplate the smoking ruins and wonder what hit us.
The truly reasonable men who know where the solutions lie are finding it harder and harder to get a hearing. They are despised, mistrusted and even persecuted by their own kind because they advocate such apparently outrageous things as law enforcement. If half the energy that goes into violent acts were put to good use, if our efforts were directed at cleaning up the shabby houses at improving living-standards and providing education and employment for all, we would have gone a long way to arriving at a solution. Our strength is weakened by having to mop up the mess that violence leaves in its wake. In a well-directed effort, it would not be impossible to fulfill the ideals of a stable social programme. The benefits that can be derived from constructive solutions are everywhere apparent in the world around us. Genuine and lasting solutions are always possible, providing we work within the framework of the law.
Before we can even begin to reflect on peaceful co-existence between the races, we must appreciate each other's problems. And to do this, we must learn about them: it is a simple exercise in communication, in exchanging information. "Talk, talk, talk," the advocates of violence say, "all you ever do is talk, and we are none the wiser." It's rather like the story of the famous lawyer who carefully explained his case to the judge. After listening to a lengthy argument the judge complained that after all this talk, he was none the wiser. "Possible, my lord," the lawyer replied, "none the wiser, but surely far better informed." Knowledge is the necessary prerequisite to wisdom: the knowledge that violence creates the evils it pretends to solve. What is the best title for this passage?
A.Advocating Violence. |
B.Violence Can Do Nothing to Reduce Race Prejudice. |
C.Important People on Both Sides See Violence As a Legitimate Solution. |
D.The Instincts of Human Race Are Thirsty for Violence. |
Recorded history has taught us
A.violence never solves anything. |
B.nothing. |
C.the bloodshed means nothing. |
D.everything. |
According the author the best way to solve race prejudice is
A.law enforcement. |
B.knowledge. |
C.nonviolence. |
D.Mopping up the violent mess. |
Since the Internet came into homes, the daily life has never been the same again. But the thing that worries most of us is that we can get viruses from the Internet. But can we catch viruses on our cell phones? A new study in the journal Science says yes, but the spread of such mobile software that can bring harm to our cell phones won’t reach dangerous levels until more cell phones are on the same operating system.
Computers are easily attacked by viruses because they share data, especially over the Internet. Of course, nowadays, more people are using their cell phones more and more frequently. They use them for emailing, text messaging and downloading troublesome ring tones, etc.,so it is obvious that cell phone viruses are a threat as well.
Scientists used nameless call data from more than six million cell phone users to help model a possible outbreak. And they concluded that viruses that spread from phone to phone by Bluetooth are not much concerned, because users have to be in close physical relation for their phones to “see” one another. However, viruses that spread through multimedia messaging services can move much faster, because they can come in disguise(伪装), such as a cool tune sent by a friend. The good news is that to be effective, these viruses need their victims(受害人) to all use the same operating system, which not enough of us do. Because there is no Microsoft operating system for mobile phones, yet. Thank goodness.What is the passage mainly about?
A.The operating system of cell phones. |
B.The threat of cell phone viruses. |
C.The wide use of cell phones. |
D.Computer viruses. |
When ______, cell phone viruses can be dangerous.
A.all the cell phones work on the same operating system |
B.Microsoft operating system for cell phones is created |
C.users can see each other on the phones |
D.Bluetooth is widely used |
What can we infer about Bluetooth according to the scientists?
A.It can increase the chances of cell phone viruses greatly. |
B.It can help us to stop the spreading of cell phone viruses. |
C.It won’t possibly cause the outbreak of cell phone viruses. |
D.It can make users have close physical relation with one another. |
We can learn from the passage that ______.
A.it is impossible to catch viruses on our cell phones |
B.cell phones are not well connected with the Internet |
C.it is dangerous for people to download ring tones to cell phones |
D.more than one operating system is used for cell phones now |
As a school teacher, Inderjit Khurana used to take the train to work. And one day, at the station, she saw dozens of children who spent their days begging from train passengers rather than going to school. She learned that it was not a rare problem and that millions of children in India lived on the streets.
Realizing that these children would never be able to escape poor life and homelessness without education, and that it would be impossible to send these children to school, Inderjit decided to create a model program---taking the school to the most out- of-school children.
Khurana’s train platform schools aim to provide a creative school form and give children the basic levels of education. Her last goals reach far beyond the 20 platform schools she and her colleagues have created in India’s Bhubaneswar region. She is determined that her program will become a model for changing the lives of the poorest children throughout India and the world.
Khurana founded the Ruchika Social Service Organization(RSSO) in 1985. The teachers gather the children together between the stops of the train for reading, writing, maths and history taught through songs and other teaching tools.
Khurana recently comes to realize that the education of these children is impossible when the most basic needs of their families are not being met. So she also provides food and medicine for their families.
Khurana insists that every child have the right to an education and that if a child cannot come to the school, then the school must come to him or her.Khurana’s final aim is to.
A.make the poorest children’s lives better |
B.put an end to the problem of children’s dropout(辍学) |
C.attract more students to her platform schools |
D.set up 20 platform schools throughout India |
What can we learn about the RSSO?
A.It has a history of more than 30 years. |
B.It provides jobs for the poorest children. |
C.It gives money to the out-of-school children. |
D.Its work doesn’t only include free education for the street children. |
Khurana also offers free food and medicine to the children because_____.
A.the basic family needs are included in her model program |
B.she hopes to draw more people’s attention to the RSSO |
C.they are the necessities for the out-of-school children |
D.she wishes to improve local people’s living standard |
Researchers at the University of Kansas say that people can accurately judge 90 percent of a stranger’s personality simply by looking at the person’s shoes.
“Shoes convey a thin but useful piece of information about their wearers,” the authors wrote in the new study published in the Journal of Research in Personality. “Shoes serve a practical purpose, and also serve as nonverbal(非语言的) indications with symbolic messages. People tend to pay attention to the shoes they and others wear.”
Medical Daily notes that the details detected in the study include a person’s general age, sex, income, political affiliation(派别), and other personality characteristics, including someone’s emotional stability.
Lead researcher Omri Gillath said the judgments were based on the style, cost, color, and condition of someone’s shoes. In the study, 63 University of Kansas students looked at pictures showing 208 different pairs of shoes worn by the study’s participants. Volunteers in the study were photographed in their most commonly worn shoes, and then filled out a personality questionnaire.
So, some of the results were expected: People with higher incomes most commonly wore expensive shoes, and flashier footwear was typically worn by extroverts(外向者).
However, some of the more specific results are interesting. For example, “practical and functional” shoes were generally worn by more “agreeable” people, while ankle boots went more closely with “aggressive” personalities.
The strangers of all may be that those who wore “uncomfortable looking” shoes tend to have “calm” personalities.
And if you have several pairs of new shoes or take exceptional care of them, you may suffer from “attachment anxiety”, spending a large amount of time worrying about what other people think of your appearance.
There was even a political calculation in the mix with more liberal types wearing “shabbier and less expensive” shoes.
The researchers noted that some people will choose shoe styles to mask their actual personality characteristics, but researchers noted that volunteers were also likely to be unaware that their footwear choices were showing deep awareness into their personalities.According to Omri Gillath, a stranger’s personality can be judged by ___.
A.the age and sex of the person |
B.the personality questionnaire by the person |
C.the emotional stability of the person |
D.the shoes the person wearst |
We can infer from Paragraph 2 that ___.
A.a practical purpose is to wear shoes |
B.people want to buy new shoes they pay attention to |
C.shoes are vital to their wearers |
D.the Journal of Research in Personality is a magazine |
The underlined word “agreeable” is closest in meaning to __.
A.gentle | B.weak | C.generous | D.considerate |
Which might be the best title for the passage?
A.Good Shoes, Good Character |
B.Bad Shoes, Bad Personality |
C.Shoes and Their Wearers’ Personality |
D.Shoes Shape A Person’s Character |
We know that the earth has become warmer over the last century. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a group established by the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Program, reports that the average surface temperature of the earth has increased during the twentieth century by 0.6°+ 0.2°C.(The + 0.2°C means that the increase might be as small as 0.4°C or as great as 0.8°C). This may seem like a small shift, but although regional and short—term temperatures do fluctuate(变动) over a wide range, global temperatures are generally quite stable. In fact, the difference between today’s average global temperature and the average global temperature during the last Ice Age is only about 5 degrees C. Indeed, it’s warmer today around the world than at any time during the past 1,000years, and the warmest years of the previous century have occurred within the past decade.
We also know that human activities—primarily the burning of fossil fuels—have increased the greenhouse gas content of the earth’s atmosphere significantly over the same period. Carbon dioxide is one of the most important greenhouse gases, which trap heat near the planet’s surface.
The vast majority of climate researchers agree with these overall findings. The scientific disagreements that do still exist primarily concern detailed aspects of the processes that make up these largely accepted general themes.
You can think of this website as a window into the world of scientific research. In this primer, you’ll find a general discussion of the physical processes underlying the earth’s climate, an outline of the kinds of data that may shed light on how the climate is changing—and the role of human activity in these changes—and a description a some of the questions and uncertainties that researchers continue to explore. This primer is organized into four interconnected sections: the Atmosphere; the Hydrosphere(水圈); the Cryosphere(低温层); and the Biosphere(生物层).We know from the text that “IPCC”___.
A.engages in the climate and changes about the earth. |
B.is a group by scientists who like to walk around the moon |
C.works in the World Meteorological Organization |
D.often greets the passers-by from the outer space |
We know from the text that carbon dioxide ___.
A.is one of the most important greenhouse gases |
B.has fossil fuels |
C.traps cold near the planet’s surface |
D.exist in human activities |
From the text, we know when we say the temperature of something has increased by about 0.7+ 0.2°C, the + 0.2°C means___.
A.the increase might by as small as 0.3°C or as great as 0.7°C |
B.the increase might by as small as 0.5°C or as great as 0.8°C |
C.the increase might by as small as 0.5°C or as great as 0.9°C |
D.the increase might by as small as 0.4 C or as great as 0.8°C |
What would be the best title for this text?
A.What Are the Scientific Disagreements |
B.You Can Think of This Website |
C.What Do We Know about Global Climate Change? |
D.The Vast Majority of Climate Researchers |
Shirley Temple Black, who lifted America’s spirit as a bright-eyed child movie star during the Great Depression, peacefully passed away at her California home on Monday evening at 85, surrounded by her family and caregivers.
Temple, born on April 23, 1928, started her entertainment career in the early 1930s and was famous by age 6. Temple was 3 when her mother put her in dance school, where a talent scout spotted her and got her in Baby Burlesks, a series of short movies with child actors playing in adult movies.
Movie studio directors took notice of her and in 1934 she appeared in the film Stand Up and Cheer! and her song and dance caught people’s attention. Movies such as Little Miss Marker and Bright Eyes featured her signature song. In 1935, she received a special Oscar for her “outstanding contribution to screen entertainment” in the movie Stand Up and Cheer!
She made some 40 feature movies, including The Little Colonel, Poor Little Rich Girl, Heidi and Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm, in 10 years, starring with big-name actors like Randolph Scott, Lionel Barrymore and Jimmy Durante. Temple was a superstar before the term was invented. She said she was about 8 when crowds shouting their love for her made her realize she was famous. “I wondered why,” she recalled. “I asked my mother and she said, ‘Because your films make them happy.’ ”
Her child career came to an end at 12. She tried a few roles as a teenager—including opposite future president Ronald Reagan in That Hagen Girl – but retired from the screen in 1949 at 21.
Temple was only 17 when she married for the first time to John Agar, who would eventually appear with her in two movies. Their five-year marriage produced a daughter. In 1950 she wed Charles Black in a marriage that lasted until his death in 2005. She and Black had two children. Temple’s interest in politics was sparked in the early 1950s when her husband was called back into the Navy to work in Washington.For which movie did Shirley Temple win the Oscar?
A.That Hagen Girl |
B.Little Miss Marker |
C.Stand Up and Cheer |
D.The Little Colonel |
When Temple first caught the audience’s eyes, ____.
A.she hoped to play a role in a series of movies |
B.her family was offered |
C.her mother sent her to a local dance school |
D.the United States was in fact in financial straits |
After Temple got married to Charles Black, ____.
A.she might have begun her political life |
B.she had to raise her two young children |
C.she decided to work for the Navy |
D.she ended her film career on screen |
It can be inferred from the fourth paragraph that ___.
A.people could find happiness in Temple’s films |
B.Temple’s mother only focused on income |
C.Temple disliked crowds shouting at her |
D.Temple’s mother was worried about her |