Recently, an almost literal case of lifeboat ethics(伦理) occurred. On Aug. 4, Graham and Sheryl Anley, while boating off the coast of South Africa, hit a rock. As the boat threatened to sink the husband got off, but his wife was trapped in the boat. Instead of freeing his wife and getting her to shore, Graham grabbed Rosie, their pet dog. With Rosie safe and sound, Graham returned for Sheryl. All are doing fine.
It's a great story, but it doesn't strike me as especially newsworthy. News is supposed to be about something fairly unique, and recent research suggests that, in the right circumstances, lots of people also would have grabbed their Rosie first.
We have strange relationships with our pets. We lavish our pets with adoration and better health care than billions of people receive. We speak to pets with the same high-pitched voices that we use for babies. As an extreme example of our feelings about pets, the Nazis had strict laws that guaranteed the humane treatment of the pets of Jews being shipped to death camps.
A recent paper by George Regents University demonstrates this human involvement with pets to an astonishing extent. Participants in the study were told a situation in which a bus is out of control, bearing down on a dog and a human. Which do you save? With responses from more than 500 people, the answer was that it depended: What kind of human and what kind of dog?
Everyone would save a brother, grandparent or close friend rather than a strange dog. But when people considered their own dog versus people less connected with them—a distant cousin or a hometown stranger—votes in favor of saving the dog came rolling in. And an astonishing 40% of respondents, including 46% of women, voted to save their dog over a foreign tourist.
What does a finding like this mean? First, that your odds aren't so good if you find yourself in another country with a bus bearing down on you and a cute dog. But it also points to something deeper: our unprecedented(史无前例的) attitude toward animals, which got its start with the birth of humane societies in the 19th century.
We prison people who abuse animals, put ourselves in harm's way in boats between whales and whalers and show sympathy to Bambi and his mother. We can extend empathy to an animal and feel its pain like no other species. But let's not be too proud of ourselves. As this study and too much of our history show, we're pretty selective about how we extend our humaneness to other human beings.What is the function of the first paragraph?
A.To create a relaxing mood for readers. |
B.To present the theme of this essay straightly. |
C.To lead in the main topic of this essay. |
D.To raise problems that will be solved later. |
The author mentions Nazi laws in the third paragraph _______________.
A.to show how cruel the Nazis were to the Jews |
B.as an example to persuade people not to love pets |
C.to illustrate the strange relationship between human and pets |
D.as an example to display the humaneness of the Nazis |
Which of the following is true according to the article?
A.The story of the Anleys and their dog was too unique to be newsworthy. |
B.Most people surveyed choose to save their own dog rather than a human. |
C.It was in the 19th century that human beings started to love their pets. |
D.Human beings are more and more concerned with animals nowadays. |
What does the author mainly argue for?
A.Pets are of great significance to us human beings. |
B.We should rethink about our attitude towards animals and mankind. |
C.It is kind of human beings to extend humaneness to animals. |
D.We should be selective when showing attitude toward other human beings. |
How should one invest a sum of money in these days of inflation(通货膨胀)? Left in a bank it will hardly keep its value, however high the interest rate.Only a brave man, or a very rich one, dares to buy and sell on the Stock Market (股市).Today it seems that one of the best ways to protect your savings and even increase your wealth is to buy beautiful objects from the past.Here I am going to offer some advice on collecting antique (古董) clocks, which I personally consider are among the most interesting of antiques.
I sometimes wonder what a being from another planet might report back about our way of life.“ The planet Earth is ruled by a mysterious creature that sits or stands in a room and makes a strange ticking sound.It has a face with twelve black marks and two hands.Men can do nothing without its permission, and it fastens its young round people’s wrists so that everywhere men go they are still under its control.This creature is the real master of Earth and men are its slaves.”
Whether or not we are slaves of time today depends on our culture and personality, but it is believed that many years ago kings kept special slaves to tell the time.Certain men were very clever at measuring the time of day according to the beating of their own hearts.They were made to stand in a fixed place and every hour or so would shout the time.So it seems that the first clocks were human beings.
However, men quickly found more convenient and reliable ways of telling the time.They learned to use the shadows cast by the sun.They marked the hours on candles, used sand in hour-glasses, and invented water-clocks.Indeed, any serious student of antique should spend as much time as possible visiting palaces, stately homes and museums to see some of the finest examples of clocks from the past.
Antique clocks could be very expensive, but one of the joys of collecting clocks is that it is still possible to find quite cheap ones for your own home.After all, if you are going to be ruled by time, why not invest in an antique clock and perhaps make a future profit ?According to the passage, collecting antique clocks___________.
A.can hardly keep the value of your savings |
B.will cost much of your savings |
C.may increase your wealth |
D.needs your bravery |
By quoting (引用) the remark (话) of a being from another planet, the author intends to ________________.
A.suggest human beings are controlled by a clock |
B.describes why clocks can rule the planet Earth |
C.tell readers what clocks look like |
D.compare clocks to human beings |
Which of the following is NOT mentioned as a way to measure the time ?
A.Counting the beating of one’s own heart. |
B.Making use of candles, sand and water. |
C.Observing shadows cast by the sun. |
D.Keeping all the slaves busy day and night. |
The underlinedphrase stately homes in paragraph 4 means ____.
A.state-owned houses | B.houses in very good condition |
C.grand houses open to the public | D.houses where statesmen meet regularly |
The purpose of the passage is ________________.
A.to introduce the culture of antique clocks |
B.to offer some advice on collecting antique clocks |
C.to compare different ways to make a future profit |
D.to explain convenient and reliable ways of telling time |
Do you sometimes argue about what seems to you to be a simple fact ? Do you argue whether it’s cold outdoors or whether the car in front of you is going faster than the speed limit ?
If you get into such arguments, try to think about the story about the six blind men and the elephant.The first blind man who felt the elephant’s trunk said it was like a snake.The second who felt the elephant’s side said it was like a wall, while the third said it was like a spear as he touched the animal’s tusk.The fourth, who had hold of the elephant’s tail insisted that it was like a rope.The fifth man said it looked like a tree as he put his arm around one the elephant’s legs.
The sixth, who was tall and got hold of the elephant’s ears, said it was like a huge fan.
Each man’s idea of the animal came from his own experience.So if someone disagrees with you about a “simple fact”, it’s often because his experience in the matter is different from yours.
To see how hard it is for even one person to make up his mind about a “simple fact”, try this simple experiment.Get three large bowls.Put ice water in one.Put hot water in the second.Put lukewarm water in the third.Now put your left hand in the ice water.Put your right hand in the hot water.After thirty seconds, put both hands in the lukewarm water.Your right hand will tell you the water is cold.Your left hand will tell you it’s hot !What makes people think about simple facts differently ?
A.The fact that simple facts differ from one another |
B.The fact that people have different experience in the same simple fact |
C.The fact that people often disagree with one another |
D.The fact that it’s hard to make up one’s mind about simple facts |
The writer’s advice is _______________.
A.We should never think about simple facts |
B.We should never judge something with a one-sided view |
C.We should not agree about simple facts |
D.We must learn from the six blind men |
After reading the last paragraph, we may think of __________.
A.Newton’s law | B.Galileo’s theory of falling objects |
C.Einstein’s theory of relativity | D.Marx’s On Capital (资本) |
After we meet people it is up to us to make them our friends.Let us stop a moment and consider what really makes a friend.The major qualities like faithfulness, devotion, friendly company, flash through our minds.But it is the large number of very small particular qualities that make up one’s whole character, such as cheerfulness, friendliness, and punctuality (守时).After all, “ to make a friend, be a friend” is not such a big and difficult order.There are particular favorable qualities, which attract others to us, and some elements which do have an effect on people in fundamental psychology(基础心理学) or not.
If you are in the presence of a shy person, talking and asking casual (随意的) questions may bring him out of his shell.Think of what would be most acceptable to the other person, for you to talk, or to listen.Either way the goal is to make yourself pleasant.
Always remember to listen, but listen intelligently.To have anyone “ hang on our words” is the most unnoticeably clever way in the world to please somebody.For a few extremely happy seconds we are the centre of attraction, but when it is our turn to be audience, let us remember how we felt as the actor, and let’s be genuinely (真正地) interested in what the other fellow is saying.
Other people will like us, if we like them.If you want friends, keep your mind and heart open to friendship.Be alive to the other person’s world.This passage is mainly about_________________.
A.the ways of talking to a shy person |
B.some favorable qualities to be a psychologist |
C.how to make yourself attractive to your listeners |
D.how to make a friend and be a friend |
The words “ bring him out of his shell” in this passage most probably means ____.
A.make him become active |
B.make him feel more nervous |
C.help him understand the question better |
D.help him listen intelligently |
According to the passage, an important way in making friends is to ________.
A.attract them | B.be attracted |
C.listen attentively | D.talk widely |
The words “ Be alive to” in the last sentence of this passage most probably means________.
A.be aware of | B.keep with |
C.deal with | D.be ignorant of |
American cities are similar to other cities around the world — American cities are changing, just as American society is changing. After World War Two, the population of most large American cities decreased; however, the population in many Sun Belt cities increase. Los Angeles and Houston are cities where population shifts (转移) to and from the city reflect the changing values of American society. In the late 1940s and early 1950s, city residents became wealthier. They moved out of their apartments in the city to buy their own homes. They bought houses in the suburbs.
Now things are changing. The children of the people who left the cities in the 1950s are now adults. Many, unlike their parents, want to live in the cities. They continue to move to Sun Belt cities and older ones of the Northeast and Midwest. Many young professionals are moving back into the city. They prefer the city to the suburbs because their jobs are there, or they just enjoy the excitement and possibilities that the city offers.
This population shifting is bringing problems as well as benefits. Countless poor people must leave their apartments in the city because the owners want to sell the buildings or make apartments for sale instead of for rent. In the 1950s, many poor people did not have enough money to move to the suburbs; now many of these same people do not have enough money to stay in the cities.
Only a few years ago, people thought that the older American cities were dying. Some city residents now see a bright, new future. Others see only problems and conflicts. One thing is sure: many dying cities are alive again.What does the author think of cities all over the world?
A.They are alive. | B.They are hopeless. | C.They are similar. | D.They are different. |
Why did American city residents want to live in the suburbs after World War Two? Because ______.
A.older American cities were disappearing | B.they got richer and needed more space. |
C.cities only provided them with apartments | D.they could hardly afford to live in the city. |
According to the 3rd paragraph, a great many poor people in American cities .
A.are faced with housing problems | B.are forced to move to the suburbs |
C.want to sell their buildings | D.need more money for daily expenses |
We can conclude from the text that .
A.American cities are changing for the worse |
B.people have different views on American cities |
C.many people are now moving from American cities |
D.the population is decreasing in older American cities |
For many parents, raising a teenager is like fighting a long war, but years go by without any clear winner. Like a border conflict between neighboring countries, the parent-teen war is about boundaries — where is the line between what I control and what you do?
Both sides want peace, but neither feels it has any power to stop the conflict. Partly, this is because neither is willing to admit any responsibility for starting it. From the parents’ point of view, the only cause of their fight is their adolescents’ complete unreasonableness. And of course, the teens see it in exactly the same way, except oppositely. Both feel trapped.
In this article, I’ll describe three no-win situations that commonly arise between teens and parents
and then suggest some ways out of the trap. The first no-win situation is quarrels over unimportant things. Examples include the color of the teen’s hair, the cleanliness of the bedroom, the preferred style of clothing, the child’s failure to eat a good breakfast before school, or his tendency to sleep until noon on the weekends. The second, blaming. The goal of a blaming battle is to make the other admit that his bad attitude is the reason why everything goes wrong. The third, needing to be right. It doesn’t matter what the topic is — politics, the taws of physics, or the proper way to break an egg — the point of these arguments is to prove that you are right and the other person is wrong for both wish to be considered an authority, and therefore to command respect. Unfortunately, as long as parents and teens continue to suppose that they know more than the other, they’ll continue to fight these battles forever and never make any real progress. Why does the author compare the parent-teen war to a border conflict?
A.Both can continue for generations. | B.Both are about where to draw the line. |
C.Neither has any clear winner. | D.Neither can be put to an end. |
What does the underlined part in Para. Two mean?
A.The teens blame their parents for starting the conflict. |
B.The teens agree with their parents on the cause of the conflict. |
C.The teens accuse their parents of misleading them. |
D.The teens tend to have a full understanding of their parents. |
Parents and teens want to be right because they want to ______.
A.give orders to the other | B.know more than the other |
C.gain respect from the other | D.get the other to behave properly |
What will the author most probably discuss in the paragraph that follows?
A.Causes for the parent-teen conflicts. | B.Examples of the parent-teen war. |
C.Solutions for the parent-teen problems. | D.Future of the parent-teen relationship. |