Tre’S mom,Christina Thompson, cannot believe how much her son already learned this year in his full-day, free pre-school class in Oklahoma City. “Since he’s been in school his vocabulary has increased surprisingly,” Thompson says. “The other day he came home and said, ‘You know what ,mom? You are being ridiculous,” Thompson laughs quietly. “And then he asked, ‘Do you know what ‘ridiculous’ means, mom?’” Tre knows the entire alphabet, his numbers to 100,and he’s starting to read. And letters and numbers aside, Thompson is most struck by how fast Tre is absorbing vocabulary and language.
Of course, not all pre-school is created equal. High quality pre-schools have well-trained, well-educated teachers in the classroom (much like Tre Thompson’s teacher Mrs. Wallace, who uses play-based learning to teach both academics and social skills and can rattle off (飞快说出) a battery of data on how well her students are progressing towards their year-end goals). Texas can also offer a model for educator development: its Texas School Ready! Campaign has proven to increase the quality of participating pre-schools by providing early childhood teachers with coaching, professional development, research-based curriculum (课程),and progress monitoring. States and districts should also combine pre-school with the K-12 system, as Oklahoma does ,so that children enter kindergarten smoothly.
Oklahoma is one of the leading states in providing students like Tre with free ,full-day pre-school. And the results are already paying off: According to a 2012 study, Oklahoma kids that went through pre-school showed vocabulary gains 28% higher than those of children without pre-school, and math gains 44% higher than non-pre-school kids. And we know that high-quality pre-school doesn’t just mean higher scores in elementary school. They were more likely to have graduated from high school and less likely to have committed a violent crime. They also earned more money and were more likely to be employed.
We know pre-school works, so let’s stop talking and start building a system where all children have access to excellent early childhood education. As any well-educated four year old could tell us, not doing so would be ridiculous.The case of Tre in the first paragraph serves as the evidence of______.
A.children’s disrespect towards parents |
B.the bad performance of students at school |
C.the positive effect of pre-school on children |
D.Thompson’s doubt about her son’s education |
At high quality pre-schools, children may learn by______
A.playing | B.modelling | C.researching | D.monitoring |
It can be inferred that______.
A.children can not enter kindergarten without pre-school |
B.Oklahoma is the best state offering full-day pre-school |
C.all pre-schools have well-trained, well-educated teachers |
D.kids with pre-school may be better equipped for their future |
What would be the best title for the passage?
A.Not all pre-school works |
B.All pre-school is created equal |
C.We owe our kids universal pre-school |
D.Pre-school goes well with K-12 system |
One of my wonderful memories is about a Christmas gift. Unlike other gifts, it came without wrap(包装).
On September 11th, 1958, Mum gave birth to Richard. After she brought him home from hospital, she put him in my lap, saying. “I promised you a gift, and here it is.” What an honour! I turned four a month earlier and none of my friends had such a baby doll of their own. I played with it day and night. I sang to it. I told it stories. I told it over and over how much I loved it!
One morning, however, I found its bed empty. My doll was gone! I cried for it. Mum wept and told me that the poor little thing had been sent to a hospital. It had a fever. For several days, I heard Mum and Dad whispering such words as “hopeless”, “pitiful”, and “dying”, which sounded ominous.
Christmas was coming. “Don’t expect any presents this year,” Dad said, pointing at the socks I hung in the living room. “If your baby brother lives, that’ll be Christmas enough.” As he spoke, his eyes filled with tears. I’d never seen him cry before.
The phone rang early on Christmas morning. Dad jumped out of bed to answer it. From my bedroom I heard him say, “What? He’s all right?” he hung up and shouted upstairs. “The hospital said we can bring Richard home!”
“Thank God.” I heard Mum cry.
From the upstairs window, I watched my parents rush out to the car. I had never seen them so happy. And I was also full of joy. What a wonderful day! My baby doll would be home. I ran downstairs. My socks still hung there flat. But I knew they were not empty; they were filled with love!What happened to the author on September 11th, 1958?
A.He got a baby brother. |
B.He got a Christmas gift. |
C.He became four years old. |
D.He received a doll. |
What does the underlined word “ominous” in Paragraph 3 probably mean?
A.Impossible. | B.Boring. |
C.Difficult. | D.Fearful. |
Which word can best describe the feeling of the father when Christmas was coming?
A.Excitement. | B.Happiness. |
C.Sadness. | D.Disappointment. |
What is the passage mainly about?
A.A sad Christmas day. |
B.Life with a lovely baby. |
C.A special Christmas gift. |
D.Memories of a happy family. |
In his 1930 essay “Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren”, John Keynes, a famous economist, wrote that human needs fall into two classes: absolute needs, which are independent of what others have, and relative needs, which make us feel superior to our fellows. He thought that although relative needs may indeed be insatiable(无止境的), this is not true of absolute needs.
Keynes was surely correct that only a small part of total spending is decided by the desire for superiority. He was greatly mistaken, however, in seeing this desire as the only source of insatiable demands.
Decisions to spend are also driven by ideas of quality which can influence the demand for almost all goods, including even basic goods like food. When a couple goes out for an anniversary dinner, for example, the thought of feeling superior to others probably never comes to them. Their goal is to share a special meal that stands out from other meals.
There are no obvious limits to the escalation of demands for quality. For example, Porsche, a famous car producer, has a model which was considered perhaps the best sports car on the market. Priced at over $120,000, it handles perfectly well and has great speed acceleration. But in 2004, the producer introduced some changes which made the model slightly better in handling acceleration. People who really care about cars find these small improvements exciting. To get them, however, they must pay almost four times the price.
By placing the desire to be superior to others at the heart of his description of insatiable demands, Keynes actually reduced such demands. However, the desire for higher quality has no natural limits.According to the passage, John Keynes believed that .
A.desire is the root of both absolute and relative needs |
B.absolute needs come from our sense of superiority |
C.relative needs alone lead to insatiable demands |
D.absolute needs are stronger than relative needs |
What do we know about the couple in Paragraph 3?
A.They want to show their superiority. |
B.They find specialty important to meals. |
C.Their demands for food are not easily satisfied. |
D.Their choice of dinner is related to ideas of quality |
What does the underlined word “escalation” in Paragraph 4 probably mean?
A.Understanding | B.Increase |
C.Difference | D.Study |
The author of the passage mainly argues that .
A.absolute needs have no limits |
B.demands for quality are not insatiable |
C.human desires influence ideas of quality |
D.relative needs decide most of our spending |
With only about 1,000 pandas left in the world, China is desperately trying to clone(克隆)the animal and save the endangered species. That’s a move similar to what a Texas A & M University researchers have been undertaking for the past five years in a project called “Noah’s Ark”. Noah’s Ark is aimed at collecting eggs, embryos(胚胎), semen and DNA of endangered animals and storing them in liquid nitrogen. If certain species should become extinct, Dr. Duane Kraemer, a professor in Texas A & M’s College of Veterinary Medicine, said there would be enough of the basic building blocks to reintroduce the species in the future.
It is estimated that as many as 2,000 species of mammals, birds and reptiles will become extinct in over 100 years.
The panda, native only to China, is in danger of becoming extinct in the next 25 years.
This week, Chinese scientists said they grew an embryo by introducing cells from a dead female panda into the egg cells of a Japanese white rabbit. They are now trying to implant the embryo into a host animal. The entire procedure could take from three to five years to complete.
“The nuclear transfer(核子移植)of one species to another is not easy, and the lack of available panda eggs could be a major problem,” Kraemer believed. “They will probably have to do several hundred transfers to result in one pregnancy. It takes a long time and it’s difficult, but this could be ground-breaking science if it works. They are certainly not putting any live pandas at risk, so it is worth the effort,” added Kraemer, who is one of the leaders of the project at Texas A & M, the first-ever attempt at cloning a dog. “They are trying to do something that has never been done, and this is very similar to our work in Noah’s Ark. We’re both trying to save animals that face extinction. I certainly appreciate their effort and there’s a lot we can learn from what they are attempting to do. It’s a research that is very much needed.” The aim of “Noah’s Ark” project is to .
A.make efforts to clone the endangered pandas |
B.save endangered animals from dying out |
C.collect DNA of endangered animals to study |
D.transfer the nuclear of one animal to another |
According to Professor Kraemer, the major problem in cloning pandas would be the lack of .
A.available | B.host animals |
C.qualified researchers | D.enough money |
The best title for the passage may be .
A.China’s Success in Pandas Cloning |
B.The First Cloned Panda in the World |
C.Exploring the Possibility to Clone Pandas |
D.China- the Native Place of Pandas Forever |
From the passage we know that .
A.Kraemer and his team have succeeded in cloning a dog |
B.scientists try to implant a panda’s egg into a rabbit |
C.Kraemer will work with Chinese scientists in clone researchers |
D.about two thousand species will probably die out in a century |
Americans gave nearly $300 billion away last year. Do you know the reason? Beyond the noble goals of helping others, it is that giving will make them happier.
It is a fact that givers are happier people than non-givers. According to the Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey, a survey of 30,000 American households, people who give money to charity are 43% more likely than non-givers to say they are “very happy” about their lives. Similarly, volunteers are 42% more likely to be very happy then non-volunteers.
The happiness difference between givers and non-givers is not due to differences in their personal characteristics, such as income or religion. Imagine two people who are identical in terms of income and faith, as well as age, education, politics, sex, and family circumstances, but one donates money and volunteers, while the other does not. The giver will be, on average, over 40 percentage points more likely to be very happy than the non-givers.
A number of studies have researched exactly why charity leads to happiness. The surprising conclusion is that giving affects our brain chemistry. For example, people who give often report feelings of euphoria, which psychologists have referred to as the “Helper’s High”. They believe that charitable activity produces a very mild version of the sensations people get from drugs like morphine and heroin.
Of course, not only does giving increase our happiness, but also our happiness increases the possibility that we will give. Everyone prefers to give more when they are happy. Researchers have investigated this by conducting experiments in which people are asked about their happiness before and after they participate in a charitable activity, such as volunteering to help children or serving meals to the poor. The result is clear that giving has a strong, positive causal impact on our happiness, so does happiness on givingAccording to Paragraph 2. We can learn that .
A.only those people who gave money to charity will be happy |
B.more givers say they feel having happy lives than non-givers |
C.those who donate money are happier than those who volunteer |
D.42% of the volunteers say they are as happy as the non-volunteers |
What causes the happiness difference?
A.Income. | B.Faith. | C.Education. | D.Donation. |
The underlined word “euphoria” in Paragraph 4 is closest in meaning to .
A.relaxation | B.uncertainty |
C.nervousness | D.pleasure |
If a person feels happy, he may .
A.ask for more donations | B.stop charitable activity |
C.be likely to give more | D.cook food for the poor |
Which of the following is the main theme of this passage?
A.Giving brings happiness. | B.Americans love donating. |
C.The happiness difference. | D.Feelings of volunteers. |
Finding a friend doesn’t seem like a difficult job. However, bad friends are easier to find than good friends these days. If you’re sitting there and wondering if you have a bad friend, let me define it for you.
A bad friend is someone whose jealousies and insecurities outweigh their love for someone. They night want to be a good friend but they’re too messed up in their own head to ever actually do it. They wonder if their friends are going out without them or if they’re being forgotten and left behind. People who are violently insecure don’t have what it takes to be the quality of a friend.
Bad friends are narcissistic(自恋的). They look for any opportunity to bring the conversation back to them. Worse, they might not even be aware that they’re doing it. In their mind, they might think they are the best friend ever, which is truly frightening.
Bad friends are quick-change. They’re by your side when you’re fun and you have something to give them but as soon as you’re going through a difficult time, they will become indifferent quickly. They won’t bring you cold medicine. They won’t give you a ride to the doctor, everything they do is self-serving.
If you find a friend who has these same characteristics, send them to your bad friend list immediately. Your friends are supposed to be the solution to your problems, not the source.
I believe your twenties are a time when you need positive and helpful friends. In such a time, friendships aren’t easy to maintain like they once were in school. Now we actually have to put work into it, we have to make a conscious effort to keep the friendship going. You need to ask yourself, “Is this person worth it? Do they treat me like a fool or what?” if your have doubts, try to make them clear by considering the past experiences. Toxic(有毒的) friendships do nothing but drag you down. My point is that you have to take care of yourself and stop getting in touch with your bad friends. Only surround yourself with people who bring out the best qualities in you. It may sound cruel but it’s true,.The author believes that we can easily find a .
A.close friend | B.poor friend | C.good friend | D.bad friend |
Bad friends give the author the following impressions EXCEPT being .
A.outgoing | B.insecure |
C.narcissistic | D.self-centred |
We can infer from the passage that a bad friend will when you have trouble.
A.feel worried as you do | B.try hard to help you out |
C.do nothing but leave you | D.pay more attention to you |
In the last paragraph, you are advised .
A.not to treat your friends like fools | B.not to keep a terrible friendship |
C.not to be a bad friend of others | D.not to doubt but ask yourself |
What is the purpose of the passage?
A.To tell us finding a friend is not an easy job for everyone. |
B.To help us know about bad friends and get rid of them. |
C.To encourage us to make more friends in school. |
D.To advise us not to treat our close friends badly. |