During the tsunami(海啸)disaster of 2004，over 300,000 people died．No one has counted the number of animals killed，but we know that it wasn't many．All over the region，before the disaster struck，animals were behaving strangely.
Shortly before the tsunami，in Khaolak，Thailand，twelve elephants that were giving tourists rides became agitated．They suddenly left their usual habitat，carrying four surprised Japanese tourists to safety．On the eastern coast of India，flamingos(火烈鸟)，which should be breeding at this time of year，suddenly flew to higher ground．Of the two thousand wild pigs that live in an Indian nature reserve，only one was found dead after the tsunami．
The idea that the animals are able to predict disasters is nothing new. In fact，it has been well-recorded over the years. Twelve hours before Hurricane Charlie hit Florida in 2004，fourteen sharks left their natural habitat and stayed in deep waters for two weeks. The sharks，which were being observed by US scientists，had never done this before．They escaped the hurricane．In the winter of 1975 in Haicheng，China，snakes which would normally have been hibernating(冬眠)were seen on the ground．Days later there was a big earthquake striking．
Unlike human beings，wild animals' senses are sharper and they can feel even the smallest changes in the environment．In other words，they see natural warnings that are invisible to the human eye．Ancient people probably had the similar“senses”, which they needed to survive，but these have been lost to us as modern technology leads us further away from the danger that nature creates.
The real question is，can we use the reactions of animals to save ourselves from natural disasters? Animal behaviour expert，Rupesh Kaneira，believes we have no choice．“The technology which we rely on isn't always perfect，and in poorer countries it isn't even available(可用的)．Animals know the environment better than any of us．When they run for their lives，we must follow．”The underlined word “agitated”in Paragraph 2 probably means ．
| A．worried and nervous | B．tired and uneasy |
| C．disappointed and sad | D．excited and happy |
The wild animals can predict the natural disasters because they ．
| A．can run for their lives when natural disasters happen |
| B．don't have any modern technology to help them |
| C．are being observed and tracked for scientific experiments |
| D．are quick to notice the slightest changes in the environment |
How is the third paragraph developed?
| A．By giving explanations | B．By listing examples． |
| C．By presenting the reasons． | D．By comparing the differences． |
The best title of the passage might be ．
| A．Few Animals Died in the Tsunami | B．Animals React to Disasters |
| C．Animals can Survive Disasters | D．Following Animals may Save Us |
Some kinds of mental skills naturally decrease as people get older. Yet research seems to show that some training can improve such skills. A recently published study also appears to demonstrate that the good effects of training can last for many years after that training has ended.
Researchers at Johns Hopkins University in Maryland wanted to learn how long memory and thinking skills would last in older people who trained to keep them. The people were part of the ten-year research project. They were taught methods meant to improve their memory, thinking and ability to perform everyday tasks.
More than 2,800 volunteered for the study called ACTIVE - short for Advanced (Cognitive) Training for Independent and Vital Elderly. Most studied when they were more than 70 years old.
The volunteers took one of several short training classes meant to help them keep their mental abilities. One class trained participants in skills including how to remember word lists. Another group trained in reasoning. A third group received help with speed-of-processing - speed of receiving and understanding information. A fourth group - the control group did not get any training.
Earlier results had established that the training helped the participants for up to five years. Now, lead study writer George Rebok says, the research showed most of the training remained effective a full ten years later.
Professor Rebok and his team found that the people trained in reasoning and speed-of-processing did better on tests than the control group.
"We are wondering whether those effects which endured over time would still be there ten years following the training, and in fact, that's exactly what we found."
The effect on memory, however, seemed not to last as long. Still, the old people in any of the three classes generally reported less difficulty in performing daily activities than the control group. The total training time for the older people was between 10 and 15 hours. Which statement is true according to the text？
| A．This kind of training can only have effect on people for a few years。 |
| B．The people were trained during a period of ten years. |
| C．All the people who were studied were more than 70 years old. |
| D．The second group were trained how to remember word lists. |
What can be inferred from the passage？
| A．There were four groups being trained. |
| B．The old people trained can remember words better. |
| C．The second and third group improved their skills better than the first one. |
| D．The research showed that the effect of the training could absolutely last 10 years. |
What’s the main idea of the fourth paragragh?
| A．What was the meaning of the research? |
| B．How was the research conducted? |
| C．Why was the mental training effective? |
| D．How long did the research last? |
What is the best title of the passage？
| A．Mental Training Helped Elderly Stay Sharp for Years |
| B．How to improve our mental health |
| C．Four groups of old people were trained mentally. |
| D． The result of a ten-year research |
In this life, what did you miss?
The wife asked the husband when she was 25. Despondently, the husband replied: 'I missed a new job opportunity.' When she was 35, the husband angrily told her that he had just missed the bus. At 45, the husband sadly said: 'I missed the opportunity seeing my closed relative before his last breath.' At 55, the husband said disappointingly: 'I missed a good chance to retire.' At 65, the husband hurriedly replied: 'I missed a dental appointment.' At 75, the wife did not ask the husband anymore, the husband was kneeling in front of the very sick wife. Remembering the question the wife used to ask him, this time he asked the wife the same question. The wife, with a smile and peaceful look, replied: 'In this life, I did not miss having you!' The husband was full of tears. He always thought that they could be together forever. He was always busy with work and trifles. So much so he had never been thoughtful to his wife. The husband hugged the wife tightly and said: 'Over 50 years, how I had allowed myself to miss your deep love for me.'
In the busy city life, there are many people who are always busy with work. These people revolve their lives around their jobs, these people sacrifice all their times and health to meet the social expectations. They are unwilling to spend times on health care. They miss the opportunity to be with their children in their growing up. They neglect the loved ones who care for them, and also their health. Nobody knows what is going to happen one year from now.
Life is not permanent, so always live in the now. Express your gratitude to your loved ones in words. Show your care with actions. Treat everyday as the last episode of life. In this way, when you are gone, you loved ones would have nothing to feel sorry about.What did the husband miss when his wife was 55?
| A．he missed the bus. |
| B．he missed a dental appointment.. |
| C．he missed a good chance to retire. |
| D．he missed the opportunity seeing his closed relative. |
The underlined word “permanent” (in Para.4) is closest in meaning to “_____”.
| A．lasting | B．temporary | C．lucky | D．smooth |
What is the passage mainly about?
| A．A sad love story. |
| B．Memories of a happy family. |
| C．Express your gratitude to your loved ones in words. |
| D．In this life, what did you miss. |
There was a 17% fall in the number of first year undergraduates at UK universities in the first year of higher tuition fees, official figures show.
In 2012-13 UK universities were allowed to treble their yearly fees to ￡9,000.
England saw a 12% fall in new full-time undergraduate students overall.
The government acknowledged the fall but stressed that demand for full time higher education has already "returned to record levels".
A spokesperson for Department for Business, Innovation and Skills said the figures were influenced by a higher number of students taking up places the previous year, rather than having a gap year.
"A reduction in entrants in 2012 was well documented and the numbers were affected by the significant number of students who opted not to defer their place from the year before," she said.
'Direct consequence'
The decline had not continued into the current year, she added.
"Application rates for some of the most disadvantaged young people have risen to an all time high in England and more students than ever before are being successful in securing a place at their first choice institution."
The figures, collated by the Higher Education Statistics Agency (Hesa), are official confirmation of other indications that there was a fall in the number of people going to university last year.
Previously released figures had shown declines in applications and offers of places, and the admissions body Ucas also reported a fall. What is the main idea of the passage?
| A．The number of undergraduates in Uk has decreased due to the higher fees . |
| B．The government says undergraduate numbers have 'returned to record levels'. |
| C．The reduction is the direct result of the significant number of students who opted not to defer their place from the year before. |
| D．Application rates for some of the most disadvantaged young people have risen to an all time high in England |
What does the underlined word “treble” in paragragh 2 mean?
| A．make a change | B．cut down on | C．increase three times | D．bring down |
Which of the following is Not True according to the passage?
| A．The government refused to admit the decrease. |
| B．The demand for full time higher education has already "returned to record levels". |
| C．More than one media reported the same result. |
| D．The number of the students who are successful in applying for their first choice institution is the largest. |
What is the attitude of the spokesperson for Department for Business, Innovation and Skills?
| A．contradictory | B．positive | C．negative | D．indifferent |
Dyslexia（失读症）is a learning disorder, it interferes with the ability to recognise words, and for some readers to understand what they have read.
Experts say dyslexia affects about five to ten percent of the population of the United State. Researchers have long known that people with dyslexia write or read words and letters backwards in the wrong order.
But a new study shows that people with dyslexia may have trouble redirecting（重新传入） their attention between senses, from seeing something to hearing something. The study suggests something that might help dyslexic people learn more quickly - play video games.
Vanessa Harrar of Britain's University of Oxford led the study. She reported the findings in the journal Current Biology. The study suggests that dyslexic people may have trouble moving quickly from what they read to what they hear. Doctor Harrar calls this a "sluggish shifting of attention across the senses."
"So, if you are trying to read something and then trying to listen to somebody who's reading aloud and you're trying to follow along with what they are reading -- they have to switch their attention from hearing what they are saying to looking at the piece of paper and back again. So we found they have quite sluggish shifting of attention across the senses," said Harrar.
In the study, Doctor Harrar tested 17 people with dyslexia, and 19 others without reading problems. The volunteers were asked to push a button as quickly as possible when they heard a sound, saw a light or experienced both together. Doctor Harrar compared the speed of their reactions.
She found that people with dyslexia were just as fast as the others when they saw only a picture or heard only a sound. But the dyslexics had a slower reaction time when they heard a sound and saw a picture at the same time.
Doctor Harrar feels like playing action video games could help dyslexic people shift from seeing to hearing more quickly. She adds that images in video games force the eyes to move and focus quickly.
"Video game types of things pop out of here and there, they move your eyes around the screen quite quickly in response to things quite quickly, and the more you play a video game the faster you get that kind of thing. So, the video game is really training the attention system to move quickly," said Harrar.
The study also shows that dyslexic people have the most difficulty going between what they saw and what they heard, this may have an effect on how dyslexic children are taught how to read.
When children learn the alphabet，they usually see the letter first and then hear the sound, or they see and hear the letter at the same time. The study shows that dyslexics might learn more quickly if they hear the sound of a letter or word first before seeing it.What is the main idea of the passage？
| A．Video Games are good for children. |
| B．Study Suggests Video Games Might Help Dyslexics |
| C．A study about Video Games is being carried out. |
| D．Children with Dyslexics can learn better by playing video games. |
People with Dyslexia have the following problems except_________.
| A．writing or reading words and letters backwards in the wrong order. |
| B．redirecting their attention between senses, from seeing something to hearing something. |
| C．moving quickly from what they read to what they hear. |
| D．seeing a picture or hearing a sound. |
What does the underlined word“sluggish”in Paragragh 4 mean？
| A．slow | B．wrong | C．specific | D．accurate |
Why can playing video games help dyslexic people learn more quickly?
| A．While playing video games, people will train their reading and hearing. |
| B．While playing video games, people will have a good knowledge of the system. |
| C．While playing video games, people should move their eyes around the screen quite quickly train the attention system to move quickly. |
| D．Video games can arouse their interest in reading. |
What is the importance of the finding?
| A．The finding will prove video games are not necessarily bad for children. |
| B．People with Dyslexia will be cured by playing video games. |
| C．People with Dyslexia will not be made fun of by others. |
| D．The finding may have an effect on the way to teach dyslexic children how to read. |
Drinking eight cups or two litres of water a day is longstanding advice. But is there any scientific basis for it, asks Dr Chris van Tulleken.
You know those ads that remind us that even a small drop in hydration（水合作用） levels can massively affect performance so you need to keep hydrated with whatever brand of super drink they're selling?
They seem pretty scientific don't they? Man in white coat, athlete with electrodes attached and so on. And it's not a hard sell because drinking feels right - you're hot and sweating so surely replacing that fluid must be beneficial.
Well earlier this year sports scientists in Australia did an extraordinary experiment that had never been done before.This group wanted to find out what happened to performance after dehydration. So they took a group of cyclists and exercised them until they lost 3% of their total body weight in sweat.
Then their performance was assessed after rehydration with either 1) nothing, 2) enough water to bring them back to 2% dehydration or 3) after full rehydration.
So far nothing unusual, but the difference between this and almost every other study that's ever been done on hydration was that the cyclists were blind to how much water they got. The fluid was given intravenously without them knowing the volume.
This is vital because we all, and especially athletes, have such an intimate(密切的)psychological relationship with water consumption.
Remarkably, there was no performance difference between those that were fully rehydrated and those that got nothing. This study was part of a growing movement to "drink to thirst" which hopes to persuade athletes not to over hydrate with the potentially fatal consequence of diluting your sodium level, causing hyponatraemia.
Perhaps the result shouldn't be so surprising. Humans evolved doing intense exercise in extreme heat and dryness. We are able to tolerate losses in water relatively well whereas even slight over hydration can be far more dangerous. In simple terms, being too watery is as bad for you as being too concentrated. What’s the main idea of the passage?
| A．There is no scientific basis for drinking eight cups of water a day |
| B．People used to drink eight cups of water a day |
| C．An experiment about whether people should drink eight cups of water. |
| D．People shouldn’t believe longstanding advice. |
what does the word“dehydration ”in paragragh 4 mean？
| A．doing exercise | B．losing water |
| C．drinking water | D．having a rest |
What is NOT TRUE according to the passage?
| A．Drinking too much water is bad for us |
| B．Sports scientists in Australia did an extraordinary experiment for the first time. |
| C．Those that were fully rehydrated and those that got nothing performed differently. |
| D．The cyclists didn’t know how much water they got. |
What can we learn from the last paragragh?
| A．Humans can bear losing water relatively well |
| B．It’s dangerous to drink water. |
| C．Athletes should drink more water than others. |
| D．This study was part of a growing movement to "drink to thirst". |
what is Dr Chris van Tulleken’s attitude towards the. longstanding advice？
| A．positive | B．doubtful | C．supportive | D．indifferent |